July 29th, 2010
John Scalzi’s got an interesting article up on filmcritic.com about Sci-fi movies passing the The Bechdel Test. It’s a simple test which names the following three criteria: (1) it has to have at least two women in it, who (2) who talk to each other, about (3) something besides a man.
This has got me thinking about the roles of females in long short stories and novelettes as well, especially in the pro markets. Works of this length are similar to movies, since they work within stricter space constraints than television series or novels. I know I get annoyed if too many stories in an issue seem to forget that straight white males aren’t the only people who can play an important part in our future. A good percentage of the stories I’ve reviewed here (almost all) don’t fit into that mold, not that I’d aimed to do that intentionally. They’re just the types of stories that keep my eyes glued to the page, but in any case, I’m glad so many magazines are actively seeking out diverse (and engaging) short stories.
Posted in Writer's Life | No Comments »
July 4th, 2010
Published by: Analog Science Fiction and Fact, September 2010
Photo by Sarah G. Creative Commons
The Story:
A high school counselor and sometimes basketball coach is tasked each year with consoling the students who don’t receive letters from their future selves on Red Letter Day. She knows first hand the devastating effect of not getting a peek into her future, of not getting the tidbit of advice that will encourage a certain career path, or at the least, warn of a grave mistake to be avoided. She’s spent the last 32 years wondering why her future self hadn’t told her to go straight to pro basketball out of high school, or warned her that she’d blow out her knee in her first college game. She’s the kind of person who’d leave a note for her former self, which leaves her to wonder if she won’t survive to write the note at all.
Her fiftieth birthday is now two weeks away, on which she’ll be able to write her letter to her former self. Time travel laws dictate that there can only be one message that goes back into time, with only one specific event mentioned in the letter. These strict laws insure that major past events aren’t purposefully tampered with, though millions of alternate universes are still created from the contacts, and worse, our futures become something limited by a few words scribbled onto paper.
The Craft:
SPOILERS
Red Letter Day is a great example of putting a human face on the implications of time travel. Politics would play heavily into such an invention, and could easily run amok if not strictly controlled. I really enjoyed the solution of the red letters, which allows everyone to have their hand at time travel, though not directly. This piece was also didn’t leave me with my usual time-travel headache by writing off all of the anomalies as alternate universes spurred off of the original. Seeing how the narrator’s life had been changed by not receiving a letter was touching, and it’s interesting that she fell into a life of counseling others who found themselves in the same situation. She gives a lot of thought to the situation, and even though she’s not angsty about it, we can see how deeply this has affected her, throwing her into a life-long puzzle with no solution.
Though this piece is short, it resonates well beyond the events in the story. A broader technological world exists, hinted at through mentions of interactive technology and nanosurgery. I liked how nonchalantly the science is woven into the fiction, not calling attention to itself, but there. And of course, the story poses the moral implications of time travel, even something so seemingly innocuous as a vaguely worded letter from the future — how it can destroy lives just as easily as it can save them. This story is definitely a fun one to think about, especially with the twist ending. What piece of advice would you send to your eighteen-year-old self, if any? Would it differ if you hadn’t received a note the first time around? 
Tags: Analog, science fiction, time travel
Posted in Reviews | 2 Comments »
June 28th, 2010
Photo by Steve Weaver Creative Commons
I absolutely hate the advice “write what you know.” Hate. Hate. HATE. It might make some kind of sense for first time novelists who’d rather not get bogged down in the tedium of researching on top of the monumental task of completing a large written work, but after that it becomes an excuse not to grow as a writer and a person. Some writers shy away from writing characters or different gender, race, nationality, or sexual orientation because they feel like they’ll mess it up. Well, guess what — you will mess it up, and that’s okay as long as you’re learning in the process. Next time you’ll do better. It’s like learning to ride a bike. You’ll fall down a few times, maybe scrape your elbows once or twice, but that’s just part of the thrill doing something a little scary.
My current work in progress is set in Cuba, Japan, and India — three places I’ve never been and know next to nothing about. My goal is to have enough knowledge to write a passably accurate and culturally entertaining novel without getting lost in loads of research. I’m only a few chapters into the novel, but here are a few quick and dirty tips I use:
- Learn to laugh at your mistakes. If you go into this expecting to feel like a complete idiot on at least a few occasions, then you’ve already passed the biggest hurdle to knowing what you write. You don’t have to get it perfect the first time, the second time, or even the third. You may write some clichéd characters, fall into some stereotype traps, but the more you practice, the better you get. Try writing a few short stories to get those mistakes out of your system, and before you know it, you’ll be able walk a mile in anyone’s shoes.
- Wikipedia is your friend. Yes, it might be the friend you wouldn’t trust enough to leave your wallet lying on the coffee table when you step out of the room, but if you’re wrist deep in banging out a first draft, then it’ll do an adequate job of giving you an overview of your topic and point you to some places where you might find more reliable information. If you’ve got something at the heart of your story that hinges on accuracy, then by all means, do some real research, but Wikipedia should be enough to get you through a first draft about 80% of the time. Be careful not to overload your manuscript with minutiae. A few well-placed details will work wonders without leaving you open tons of mistakes.
- Take a vacation on someone else’s dime. Wouldn’t we all love to be able to take off and journey to a foreign country, spend a few weeks or months marveling at monuments, gawking at people, and indulging at cultural festivities? If that’s not the reality you live in, don’t fret, because you too can jet-set without the hassle of passports, plug converters, traveler’s tummy. I use Flickr.com to hitch a ride on people’s vacation photos. I just type in the city that I’m interested in into the search box, then click slideshow, and I get an assortment of pictures from grand architecture to everyday drudgery, and they’re great for finding those little telltale details that really pull a reader into the story.
That should get your feet wet enough to brave your way through a first draft. Find a few trusted beta readers, preferably someone with knowledge of the areas you’re working with to catch glaring errors. While I’m letting my first draft marinate, I like to do real research, reading up on cultures in fiction and non-fiction alike. I particularly like the memoir format because the information tends to be more factual, but gives you an entertaining personal account as well. By the time your beta feedback is returned, you should have absorbed enough information to give your story a final spit and polish that will convincingly immerse your readers into your world.
Posted in Writer's Life | No Comments »